Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters

Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Cardiometry ; - (25):725-729, 2022.
Article in English | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-2226414

ABSTRACT

Work-life balance is highly desirable and involves maintaining equilibrium between professional and personal work. With the onset of a novel coronavirus pandemic, the workforce has seen unprecedented changes. Instead of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Government of India implemented a nationwide lockdown and several isolation policies. IT industry has seen a massive increase in work from home policy. Many companies permanently shift working patterns to embrace remote working. Because of this lockdown, many employees working in this sector have experienced psychological distress. With companies expecting their employees to perform with the same productivity, worklife balance has taken a toll. It becomes imperative to identify the factors that most influence the balance. The responses are collected from employees across the IT industry in various regions of India. Factor analysis is employed to identify the most and least important factors that affect work-life balance during COVID-19 lockdown.

2.
Journal of Clinical Oncology ; 40(16), 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2005694

ABSTRACT

Background: Patients with cancer have high rates of healthcare utilization due to complications of disease and treatment. Early identification of patient illness may help reduce acute care use and improve quality of care. Remote patient monitoring (RPM), a type of telemedicine involving collection and transmission of health data from a patient's home to clinicians, has promise to alleviate disparities by providing timely access and early intervention, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. Studies of digital interventions in oncology have demonstrated reduction in symptom distress and unplanned hospitalizations but lack focus on minority patients whereas studies of telehealth aiming to address disparities have not focused on patients with cancer. In this pilot study, we aimed to evaluate the feasibility of RPM among patients with cancer at a large urban medical center serving a racially and socioeconomically diverse population. Methods: We partnered with a secure HIPAA-compliant platform and FDA-approved RPM device, Current Health, which monitored heart rate, temperature, respiration, oxygen saturation, and blood pressure. The kit included broadband access and a tablet to provide telehealth services. Oncology Clinicians determined clinical inclusion and exclusion criteria of RPM initiation for patients on the bone marrow transplant service and patients with myeloma and lung cancer. A centralized team of Nurse Practitioners (NPs) monitored alarms. Clinical alarms indicated abnormal vital signs;technical alarms indicated no data transmission for a 12-hour period. We measured feasibility by recruitment and retention, and used descriptive statistics to describe the study population, time enrolled on RPM, and alarms. Results: To date, we enrolled 30 patients on the RPM platform over a 10-month period with a weekly census of 9-10 patients undergoing RPM monitoring. Of the 30 patients, 17 (57%) were white, 7 (23%) Black, and 2 (7%) Asian;2 patients (7%) identified as Hispanic. The average age was 57.4 years. The majority of patients (93%) had hematologic malignancies, all of whom were enrolled on hospital discharge. Of the 2 patients with lung cancer, 1 patient was enrolled from the outpatient setting and 1 following hospital discharge. The mean length of time per patient enrolled with the device was 21.7 days. Over 10 months, there were 393 technical and 62 clinical alarms with an average of 3 clinical alarms per week addressed by NPs by phone, indicating low clinician burden. Conclusions: This pilot study demonstrated the feasibility of RPM monitoring in patients with cancer. Future studies should evaluate patient-reported and healthcare utilization outcomes, as well as barriers to reimbursement. The identification of best practices in telemedicine implementation can accelerate adoption and increase high quality, timely, and equitable cancer care.

3.
Indian Journal of Biochemistry & Biophysics ; 59(5):595-603, 2022.
Article in English | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-1894117

ABSTRACT

The MMR vaccine as we know is a vital vaccine to protect against three disease-causing microbes- measles, mumps, and rubella. To commemorate 75 years of Indian independence, the present study delves into the achievement of Indian research and lists out articles retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection database on the domain of MMR vaccine research. The data has been restricted to the publication from India, thereby, has throwing some understanding into the MRR vaccine research in India over the last 28 years- 1994 to 2021. The data have been compared based on scientometric analysis. Qualitative and quantitative analysis have also been taken into account in order to give a comparative insight into the research. The comparison was done based on citation data, usage count data, year of publication, journals, publication media, domains focussed on the papers, and type of document. Astonishingly, in 2021, the most number of papers were published, most of them have related MMR vaccine as a potential immunity developer against COVID-19 infection. A total of 43 articles were retrieved from the search, the numbers are quite big, and the highest citation among them being 99 which was published in 2014, which is quite impressive for such a short duration of time. The comparative study suggests a positive growth of MMR vaccine research in India.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL